Reproduction: Just select 2 or more of these human structures that I captured, right click, and hit relocate. The buildings were captured using a hacker bot with a scanner + hacking tool (control group 2).
Excuse my messy base :)
Please reference included save file, where the logistics bots are constantly moving metal ore from the input block at the circuit factory block west of the command center to the input block of the reinforced plate factory block northeast of the command center. I have watched the same ration of metal ore bounce between those two factory blocks some six or seven times before the logistics bot was reassigned by the network.
Thank you!
I believe the beacon should be able to be recycled instead of destroyed to get rid of it.
Currently you have to select each building individually and change the settings per building, even if multiple building in the same blueprint use the same settings (think multiple fabricator setups with a resource hub utilizing transporters in the center)
stability going too far torwards green:
put in virus core
remove blight core
remove virus core
stability = 0
stability going too far torward purple:
put in blight core
remove virus core
remove blight core
stability = 0
i think the issue is that there are limits. even if you raised the limit higher, another blight or virus core can be put into the resimulator to max the limit until the cores are removed, essentially resetting the stability to 0. not sure if this is intended.
Seems it would fit the the rest of the manufacturing if those modules required the same methods of upgrading.
in the past, when selecting multiple units or buildings, one could change the logistic parameters of all of the selected items at once. This would make changing the channel, or even where buildings were moving materials a lot easier.
That option is no longer available. I feel this is a bug. Please bring that option back.
Logically, one would require the previous building to make the next, such as fabricator -> assembler -> robotics assembler -> refinery.
To me, it would make more sense that way. At a mimimum, require the assembler for the robotics assembler instead of the fabricator. It just seems like an arbitrary requirement for the fabricator.
the behav in this visual range 120 building loops dropped stuff in an initial smaller range and sets findings into the signal
human shuttle picks up signal and collects stuff
if the 3x2 doesn't find anything in the set range it increases the range in steps of 2
problem is: it increases range until it finds something and when the goodies are looted the 'compare register' will always exit to the 'is different' even when the 'loot' variable is empty
In the save game, I have a worker bot loaded with the integrated behavior of "Roomba on grid". It is currently searching outside of the logistic network for dropped items. This should not be happening. It does not happen on the stable branch.
Or, having a Fabricator on the medium slot of the Command Center can just craft metal plates at 4 seconds each. 9 metal plates are crafted in the time it takes to craft the 3 circuits, that being the "9" in the 12 + 9 = 21 above. So in the moment when the player could begin crafting the circuits for the first 2x1 (1M) building, if they instead just crafted 9 more metal plates in that same time, they will have 21 + 9 = 30 metal plates to just research the 1st building teir and gain access to the cheaper upgraded 2x1 (1M1S) building. The research itself taking entirely 30 seconds to complete with just 1 Uplink - 6 seconds shorter than waiting on another 3 circuits to craft.
The 2x1 (1M1S) takes only 8 more metal bars (4 seconds each Small slot = 32 seconds), and 8 more metal plates (4 seconds each Medium slot = 32 seconds, or 6 seconds each Small slot = 48 seconds), however, crucially, 1 LESS circuit (-12 seconds) which is 3 LESS metal plates (Med.= -12s OR Sm.= -18s).
At the beginning of the game with access to exactly and only 2 medium slots and potentially dozens of small slots, the metal bar and metal plate requirement are highly likely to have their work loads spread out while the circuits will likely be confined to 1 Med. slot. While the net resources between the 2x1 (1M) and (1M1S) buildings is only 2 bars more than a 1x1 (1S) building, the issue is less about the raw resources than it is about the sheer amount of time it takes to craft circuits. There's also an increased overall utility about the 2x1 (1M1S) building when compared to the 2x1 (1M) building.
In conclusion, at the current resource costs of the buildings, tech research, crafting time, and resonable slot access at the beginning of the game, the 2x1 (1M) building is just not worth building at all.
My solution would be to reduce the crafting cost of the 2x1 (1M) building from 3 circuits to 1 circuit, and reduce the inventory from 4 slots to 3 slots so that it remails limited to only early game item crafting that require only 2 ingredients and reduces its utility as a cheap 2x1 building in later game stages. Similar in utility as is between the 1x1 (1S) and 1x1 (2S) buildings, but for medium slot crafting purposes, and without replacing the utility of the 1x1 (2S) due to native overclocking.
I just did the count, I have over 2000 producers in my colony. all of them setup individially.
there is no group: configure productiom, upgrade buildings, requesting to building don´t work in groups of multi slot buildings, relocating building can´t be done in groups.
why do you want the game to feel like getting puches in the dick ??????
storage block in the build menu.
when you resource medium size it is places after the small one on the build menu
(which makes sense )
when you research the big storage block, it is places before the small one.
so it end up being in order : biggest, smallest, medium ... why ????
(unit linked on hotkey 9)
upgrading buildings are really bad,. you can only upgrade singler buildings, and for some reason you need to confirm twice.
why can´t we upgrade rows of (Identical)building ?? and with a single confirmations
when I select 1 double slot building I can request 2 producers to be delivered.
if I select a row of double slot building, no matter how many I rerquest, they only deleiver 1 per building. which mean I have to request again.
also another annoence. when I select 1 building I can select the production options. but if I select a row a building that option disapears.
I can´t order producers and set them up in bulk. which I really annoying.
if I want to set up a 50 double slot building iron bar line.. then I first have to request 50 producers, then wait, then go back and order another 50 producers. then I have to set up the 100 producers individial. why ??????
Dies funktioniert aber nicht. Die Option "Keine" verhält sich so genauso wie "Passiv".
Es erscheinen dennoch Insekten.
Ich bin ein gemütlicher Aufbauspieler und mag kein Stress. Ich hatte ein Spiel gestartet ohne Insekten.
Da auch keine Insekten zu sehen waren, hab ich mich natürlich gefreut und mehrere Stunden Fortschritt gemacht.
Weil ein Insektenloch im Weg war, habe ich dieses dann versucht zu entfernen. Daraufhin erschienen dann Insekten und es kam ein Meldung, das die Insekten jetzt feindlich Gesinnt sind.
Da ich keine Abwehr aufgebaut hatte wurde ich überrant und mein Game war futsch. hmm.
Daher bitte, baut die Option "Keine" Insekte richtig ein.
Danke für das super Spiel und ein Frohes Fest. ;)
why can´t people delete feedback. ????
i´m sure most of the feedback is just people misunderstanding stuff, and they want to delte the feedback when they understand
some of my feedback I would love to take back.
just seems like you would be swamped with stuff people would delete if they had the oppunituity
Component efficiency increases power draw but not power production. Consider giving power generating components a boost in output based on efficiency.
Milestones should carry across playthroughs, especially the satellite ones since how many AMACs will a player be able to constantly feed even late game.
The Larva and the frames it spawns on death just have Melee Pulse Attack as the weapon component unlike the other bugs which have more natural sounding attacks.
When the Blight Simulation Core for the space elevator arc is produced it feels like there should be some more dialog from HIGGS about the relevance of the core.
The AI Behaviour Controller would benefit from being able to search the network/power grid it is in for units/items matching filters similar to how radars search at a local level.
The functionality of Set To Component Remotely to set the signal, visual, store and go to of units should be made more clear or accept the values in the menu above parameters.
There is currently no way to automatically set behaviour input parameters and registers (eg. Store/Go To) for units produced by behaviours. Consider adding a field to the Produce Unit behaviour action that allows the unit to be associated with a variable on production completion?
The whole accessing human technology though the Time Egg quest seems very pyric in that it requires advancement of the human tech tree to Human Science to complete and only gives Human Refineries and the Human Science Lab before needing the Human Warehouse to be unlocked by conventional research which is only 120 Human Research Data away.
Under behaviours the Is Passable function needs the top node to be noted as occupied by player entities.
The range limitations of the Get from Component Remotely and Set to Component Remotely should be specified in the description of those behaviour functions.
For the autobase functions of the AI Behaviour Controller it would be nice if there was one that could enumerate all frames in the network matching a blueprint.
For the AI Behaviour Controller add a function that allows remote launching so mothership ejection can be more easily automated.
As satellites automatically return, the Land behaviour function seems obsolete.
Consider changing the Launch function to an Activate since it can already also eject from the mothership. Adding additional functionality to handle plot "click to proceed" events, such as those involving the explorer interaction with quest related explorables or the console, would also be welcome for players trying a no human intervention challenge.
Under the game settings there should be an option, potentially unlocked by beating the story, to include an active AI Behaviour Controller set to a behaviour from the player favourites in the internal socket of the starting Command Center bot.
Add a Unit field to the Restart Behaviour function to allow bots to automatically reactivate behaviours on other bots. Potentially can have the same range limitations as Set To Component Remotely with/without an AI Behaviour Controller.