I lock the items in as they appear.
to see what happens COPY from a blank factory Just below and paste it into/onto the robotic assebler factory, after it is reset, or just select a blank factory and set the ITEM to Robotics assebler and start the integrated behavior. watch to see what shows in the slots, fabricators are not suposed to be there.
Don't show the hovered tiles on the ground when pointer is in the UI
When right clicking a resource make sure both miners attached starts mining it, not just one of them.
Right click phase flowers/power flowers/enemies should attack them
One way is adding filter Now Owned, so we can narrow Radar down immegiately, and this filter seems overall quite useful. Another way is adding direct Glitch Bots filter, but it seems too specific to me, so may not be the best idea.
In my case, I need it for patrols, where bots can seek bugs, glitch bots and flowers to destroy. Currently I need to have three Radar nodes one after another to cover all of them, which are very slow and clunky to run
You've heard this before but more fully documenting the programming behaviors would be a huge help. Have you considered letting people contribute missing documentation to the various behavior programming commands. Prior to my retirement, I was in software engineering for my entire career and would be happy to contribute. But I also understand that you would need to review the contributions for accuracy and how to manage multiple contributions for a single behavior item would be tricky. Possibly a dumb idea but just trying to "help the cause".
-Best!
For example, I have a miner, which has two responsibilities - mine and send radio signal for transport to pick up resources, when it has some above threshold. These are best separated by different behaviours to allow parallel processing to decrease reaction time to changing environment (bugs, node dried up, more bugs) and increase frequency of updates for radio, allowing transport, that listens for the radio, to select new target faster and decrease its downtime.
I'm a lazy person, so I want to set up parameters for just one controller, Miner one. This controller in turn would configure Provider controller to provide specific resource it mines, say, Metal Ore.
I can set up the parameter just fine with Set to Component, but I can't run Provider behaviour on a separate controller, if it's stopped. Instead I need to click Run button on the interface, which would in my example require unpausing and waiting for miner behaviour to run for a couple of ticks and update Provider parameter. This is due to Provider not working correctly if no parameter is passed, which would be the default state. I can, of course, set it up so that it awaits for non-empty parameter(s) to be set before continuing into main body of behaviour, but this is quite clunky and requires blueprint to be set up with behaviour already running, though this is exactly what I'm doing right now.
If we could start/stop/restart neighbour controllers on the same unit, and even select their behaviours, it would allow us engineer more complex interactions between controllers and design more responsive and powerful units. At least I think so :)
I deployed a Command Center a few days ago, and it refuses to be constructed. The progress bar just continues to loop. I can't do anything with the building in progress, can't move it, can't delete it, nothing happens, which is even more frustrating.
Energy Plates
High density cubes
First I found "Is a", which works only with items. While description says that it works only with items, the title does not. When compared to "Is Unit a" it reads more like "check whether this object is of that type" and makes it look generic, despite being similar to "Is Unit a". I'd suggest renaming it to "Is Item a" to keep it consistent and prevent confustion. At least it confused me, so much that I wanted to report it as a bug first.
Second one, I tried using "Is Unit a", following an example. It still gave me false, even though as seen on screenshot, both are construction. Description says "unit frame type", so I suppose it compares in terms of Worker, Scout etc, and construction is not that. If this node is specific to unit frames, it would be nice to rename it to "Is Unit Frame a", or I could be understanding it wrong here.
Finally, what I needed was "Match", which works perfectly, but finding it is a journey, and somewhat frustrating one. I basically found it randomly, because it is named so differently from other similar nodes. I'd say something like "Is of Type" or "Compare Type" would work better, as it would show up when looking up for these types of nodes.
While descriptions usually contain useful info, it works when I've already found the node I needed. But when I'm in discovery stage, I first need to find it by name, and that was hard.
Confirm
Do you want to upgrade this unit?
Hold down the control key to skip this confirmation.
I use a behavior in a storage to distribute the goods around, in other storage. To do that I use parameters that points to the destination locations (up to 7).
With behavior launched, if I give a value to the signal (that is not used in the behavior), the first parameter of the behavior is cleared, and the behavior crashes.
To be able to analyse, I leave you the current state of the game. The behavior is called 'Distribution équitable' in the 'Bus' folder.
Thanks an other time for the good game!
Additional filter options by unit status would be helpful, such as logistics network, idleness, if running a behavior, damaged etc.
It would be very fine if there was more explanations attached to the behavior instructions, for example 'Get ressource Num' what does it ? Extract simply the number from the variable or does it really get the count of ore in the patch? Nothing said yet and very hard to know or verify ingame...
I'm enjoying Desynced a lot. Thanks for such a great game!
I have a small suggestion. When upgrading a storage chest and the original storage chest was locked for items, it would be awesome if the newly available slots after the upgrade would be at least locked to an empty item, or if all the originally locked items were the same, they could be locked to that item. I know that I can specify the locked items during upgrading, but it is easy to miss and can cause some headache.
Cheers
My mouse is on the defense block, but the center of the circle is shifted 1 up and 1 to the right. This only occurs on elevated surfaces. Additionally, the circle seems to have an extra line, which appears specifically on inclines.
To relocate them to a new home (and since the ingame help of packaging no longer applies!), i removed their drone port in that building and built a drone port at some distant location, but on setting their GOTO to that new building, they are stuck in a cycle of moving maybe 10 tiles towards that building (as their shown path also indicates), but then path back to their old home building, then try to goto their GOTO again, turn back after 10 tiles, and repeat forever.
A few new drones in that new location now behave properly(?), even going across large distances, to mine and drop crystals.
Like Minecraft, Chost recon Whildlands & breakpoint, Eurotruck,
Wouldn't be better to display the correct equipement ?
Make a UI you can open for the Re-Simulator, a better way to see what it can make.
Virus Ray and Component Recycler have identical models. The reason I noticed this is because when looking at what the Re-Simulator can make, the only way you can see it is by hovering the mouse over it. I then want to hover my mouse over the different things it can make, but there's no UI I can open; moving the mouse drops the popup.
DesyncedServer.exe "D:\Desynced Dedicated Server\Desynced\Saved\SaveGames\server3.desynced" -Port=30099 -QueryPort=37015 -SessionSettings="{ 'name': '镜影若滴的服务器2周目开启，欢迎游玩。 ', 'players': 16, 'mode': 'Separate/Versus', 'run_without_players': true, 'visibility': 'public', 'allow_faction_switch': true, 'auto_save': 10 }" -GameSettings="{ 'resource_richness': 3, 'enable_day_night': true, 'day_period': 1500, 'year_period': 50, 'peaceful': 3, 'blight_threshold': 0.1, 'plateau_level': 0.1, 'disable_minigames': true }" -logsteam
After starting the server, I entered the game briefly to check it and then left without participating in any gameplay, as I had other matters to attend to. I left the server running unattended for several days, during which no players participated - the server remained in an idle state.
Several days later, I entered the server with friends. At this point, there were 3 players, all starting from scratch. Just minutes after starting gameplay, we noticed something abnormal: the number of bugs was significantly higher than expected - abnormally high. We died several times under the invasion of countless bugs.
The number of bugs was too large - this was not normal. Soon I noticed server abnormalities. When I tried to exit and rejoin the server, I needed to download 50MB of data. In just over ten minutes, the server save file had grown from a newly created, undeveloped empty save to 50MB in size - a hundredfold increase in just minutes.
The server's CPU came under tremendous pressure and began dropping frames. I realized the severity of the issue: an excessive number of bugs had been generated in the server, quickly overwhelming it. This situation would overwhelm any server hardware.
This is clearly an optimization issue with the program. Your game doesn't seem to be designed with dedicated servers in mind. I hope you can provide a better server solution by:
Optimizing performance issues caused by bug activity
Optimizing the Peaceful Mode 'Aggressive' mechanism for server environments
Adding server commands to extensively clean the map, such as:
Command to clear all bug units
Command to clear all Dropped Items
Etc.
These would allow server administrators to directly intervene in in-game situations, significantly improving the server gaming experience.
Thank you for reviewing my feedback. Your work is excellent!
- doesn't move the pane to the top direction (Q, S and D are working well)
- cancels the last edit, which introduces a wrong behavior when not noticed
Could you please add a binding for the Undo action, and let the player remaps it to whatever (s)he wants ? And make the "up" action scrolls the editor pane as expected ?